Here are the data on white supremacist terrorism the Trump administration is ‘unable or unwilling’ to give to Congress

 

fe-charlottesville-cover

“White supremacists are very fine people.”

by Jana Winter and Hunter Walker edited by O Society August 9, 2019

White supremacists are responsible for all race-based domestic terrorism incidents in 2018, according to a government document distributed earlier this year to state, local and federal law enforcement.

The document, which was not previously reported, becomes public as the Trump administration’s Justice Department is unable or unwilling to provide data to Congress on white supremacist domestic terrorism.

The data in this document, titled “Domestic Terrorism in 2018,” appear to be what Congress has been asking for — and didn’t get.

The document, dated April 15, 2019, shows 25 of the 46 individuals allegedly involved in 32 different domestic terrorism incidents are identified as white supremacists. Prepared by New Jersey’s Office of Homeland Security Preparedness, one of the main arteries of information sharing, and sent throughout the DHS fusion center network as well as federal agencies, including the FBI.

“This map reflects 32 domestic terrorist attacks, disrupted plots, threats of violence, and weapons stockpiling by individuals with a radical political or social agenda who lack direction or influence from foreign terrorist organizations in 2018,” the document says.

The map and data circulate throughout the Department of Justice and around the country in April just as members of the Senate pushed the DOJ to provide us with precise information about the number of white supremacists involved in domestic terrorism. While the document shows this information clearly is compiled, some of the senators say the Justice Department would not give them the figures.

The DOJ did not respond to questions about why these data are not sent to Congress.

Senators on the Judiciary Committee raise concerns about how the Justice Department categorizes domestic terror incidents and expressed concerns white supremacist violence is being downplayed.

An aide to Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., who is also on the Judiciary Committee, says it is “disappointing” to discover the Justice Department has information it is “unable or unwilling” to provide to senators.

“This is disappointing but unfortunately not surprising. In April, the Justice Department and the FBI briefed Senate Judiciary Committee staff on domestic terrorism, nearly six months after Sen. Durbin’s office first requested the briefing,” the aide said.

“At the briefing, the DOJ and the FBI were unable or unwilling to provide precise data on white supremacist terrorism, and neither agency responded to our repeated follow-up questions since the briefing.”

After the briefing with officials from the Justice Department and FBI, the Senate Judiciary Committee sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr and FBI Director Christopher Wray in May outlining their concerns about the categorization of domestic terrorism incidents:

“For the past decade, the FBI used 11 different categories for domestic terrorism, including a separate category for white supremacist incidents. The Administration is now using a classification system with only four categories, including ‘racially-motivated violent extremism. This new category inappropriately combines incidents involving white supremacists and so-called ‘Black identity extremists,’ a fabricated term based on a faulty assessment of a small number of isolated incidents.”

In the letter, the senators also state they are “deeply concerned this reclassification downplays the significance of the white supremacist threat.” They indicate they asked the FBI and DOJ officials involved in the briefing for information about white supremacist terrorism and were not provided with it.

“The briefers provided statistics on racially motivated violent extremism … but could not say how many involved white supremacist violence, other than to acknowledge they were ‘a majority’ of the incidents. If we do not understand the scope of the problem, we cannot effectively address it,” the letter says.

Wray testified during a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing on July 23, and Booker asked him about the bureau’s categorization of domestic terrorist groups. A week later, Booker sent Wray a request for additional information for the record, including the number of attacks and fatalities “attributed to white supremacists since 2000.”

FBI Director Christopher Wray testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee last month. (Photo: Susan Walsh/AP)
FBI Director Christopher Wray testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee last month. (Photo: Susan Walsh/AP)

“During your hearing, I asked you a number of questions regarding the number of violent attacks and fatalities categorized as domestic terrorism, and you were unable to provide that data,” Booker wrote to Wray. Booker’s office said Wray has not responded to his request.

The April 15 document is available online on the New Jersey state government’s website.

In response to questions from Yahoo News, an FBI spokesperson declined to comment on whether the information was given to the senators, but insisted the FBI was regularly working with relevant congressional committees.

“While we don’t comment on congressional engagement, we can assure you that the FBI routinely engages with our oversight authorities in Congress around requests for information and FBI operations,” the FBI spokesperson said.

The FBI declined to comment on the April 15 document, saying the bureau “is not going to comment on somebody else’s product.”

A Department of Justice spokesperson referred Yahoo News to congressional testimony Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brad Wiegmann gave before the House Homeland Security Committee in May for a description of “the department’s efforts in the domestic terrorism area in general.”

The document groups the 46 individuals allegedly involved in domestic terror incidents last year into three categories: “race-based extremists,” “anti-government extremists” and “single-issue extremists.” But the map also includes more detailed data within these categories and all 25 of the individuals classified as “race-based extremists” are identified as “white supremacists.”

The government’s classification of individuals under specific categories does not indicate they were necessarily convicted of crimes for extremist behavior, or that the actual charges against them included an extremist element. A Yahoo News review of the cases found that many were still pending, and we blurred out details identifying two individuals. (In one instance, the status of the case was unclear; in the other, the charges were dismissed.)

Some Democrats on the Judiciary Committee have argued that the Justice Department’s decision to reduce the number of categories, and using only “race-based extremists,” will make tracking white supremacists more difficult.

Law enforcement agencies responding to an active shooter at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, on Saturday. (Photo: Joel Angel Juarez/AFP/Getty Images)
Law enforcement agencies responding to an active shooter at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, on Saturday. (Photo: Joel Angel Juarez/AFP/Getty Images)

“The Trump administration’s irresponsible decision to stop tracking white supremacist incidents as a separate category of domestic terrorism obfuscates the extent of this threat,” Durbin’s aide said.

In his testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee last month, Wray, when pressed, said the “majority” of domestic terrorism cases last year involved white supremacists. However, he did not provide specific figures.

It is not surprising to learn the data show race-based attacks last year involved white supremacists. He cited a spate of recent high-profile incidents, including the Aug. 3 shooting in El Paso that left 22 people dead, as yet another example of white supremacist mass murder.

“While white supremacy is not a new phenomenon in America, it’s incredibly troubling the way the movement has been emboldened and the administration’s efforts to obfuscate the data on these terrorist incidents simply defies logic.”

In March, Durbin introduced the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act in the wake of a shooting at a mosque in New Zealand. The bill calls on the DOJ and on FBI offices to monitor, investigate, and prosecute domestic terrorism to assess the “threat posed by white supremacists” and to “provide transparency through a public quantitative analysis of domestic terrorism-related assessments, investigations, incidents, arrests, indictments, prosecutions, convictions, and weapons recoveries.”

According to Durbin’s aide, the ambiguity in the current classification system and the DOJ’s apparent reluctance to release data on white supremacist terrorism raises concerns about whether adequate resources are being devoted to the threat.

“This highlights the problem with not specifically tracking white supremacist attacks,” the aide says of the document. “If we do not understand the scope of this problem, we cannot effectively combat it.”

One thought on “Here are the data on white supremacist terrorism the Trump administration is ‘unable or unwilling’ to give to Congress

  1. It’s not new info. During the Bush administration, there were at least a couple of official FBI reports about the threat of right-wing violence and terrorism. It was interesting to see it at the time because of the fact that Republicans were in power.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s