The Social Gospel

by Christopher Evans edited by O Society August 25, 2019

Throughout American history, religion plays a significant role in promoting social reform. From the abolitionist movement of the early 19th century to the civil rights movement of the 20th century, religious leaders champion progressive political causes.

This legacy is evident today in the group called religious progressives, or the religious left.

The social gospel movement of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as I explore in my research, has a particularly significant impact on the development of the religious left.

What is the social gospel movement and why does it matter today?

What is the social gospel?

The social gospel’s origins are often traced to the rise of late 19th-century urban industrialization, immediately following the Civil War. Largely, but not exclusively, rooted in Protestant churches, the social gospel emphasized how Jesus’ ethical teachings could remedy the problems caused by “Gilded Age” capitalism.

Movement leaders took Jesus’ message “love thy neighbor” into pulpits, published books, and lectured across the country. Other leaders, mostly women, ran settlement houses designed to alleviate the sufferings of immigrants living in cities like Boston, New York and Chicago. Their mission was to draw attention to the problems of poverty and inequality – especially in America’s growing cities.

Charles Sheldon, a minister in the city of Topeka, Kansas, explains the idea behind the social gospel in his 1897 novel “In His Steps.” To be a Christian, he argued, one needed to walk in Jesus’ footsteps.

WWJD_

The book’s slogan, “What would Jesus do?” became a central theme of the social gospel movement, which also became tied to a belief in what Ohio minister Washington Gladden called “social salvation.” This concept emphasized religion’s fundamental purpose is to create systemic changes in American political structures.

Consequently, social gospel leaders supported legislation for an eight-hour work day, the abolition of child labor, and government regulation of business monopolies.

While the social gospel produced many important figures, its most influential leader is a Baptist minister, Walter Rauschenbusch.

rauschenbusch

The legacy of Walter Rauschenbusch

Rauschenbusch began his career in the 1880s as minister of an immigrant church in the Hell’s Kitchen section of New York. His 1907 book, “Christianity and the Social Crisis” asserts religion’s chief purpose is to create the highest quality of life for all citizens.

Rauschenbusch links Christianity to an emerging theory of democratic socialism, which he believed would lead to equality and a just society.

Rauschenbusch’s writings have a major impact on the development of the religious left in the 20th century. After World War I, several religious leaders expand upon his ideas to address issues of economic justice, racism, and militarism.

Among them is A.J. Muste, known as the “American Gandhi,” who helps popularize the tactics of nonviolent direct action. His example inspires many mid-20th century activists, including Martin Luther King Jr.

Social Gospel – MLK

The intellectual influences on King are extensive. However, it is Rauschenbusch who first made King aware of faith-based activism. As King writes in 1958:

“It is my conviction ever since reading Rauschenbusch, any religion which professes to be concerned about the souls of men and is not concerned about the social and economic conditions that scar the soul, is a spiritually moribund religion only waiting for the day to be buried.”

social-principles-jesus.jpg

Social salvation and the religious left today

King’s statement highlights the importance of the social gospel concept of “social salvation” for today’s religious left.

Although many of its primary leaders come out of liberal Protestant denominations, the religious left is not a monolithic movement. Its leaders include prominent clergy, such as the Lutheran minister Nadia Boltz-Weber, as well as academics such as Cornel West. Some of the movement’s major figures, notably Rev. Jim Wallis, are evangelicals who identify with what is often called progressive evangelicalism.

cornel-west

Others come from outside of Christianity. Rabbi Michael Lerner, founder of the organization Network of Spiritual Progressives, seeks not only to promote interfaith activism but also to attract persons unaffiliated with any religious institutions.

These leaders often focus on different issues. However, they unite around the social gospel belief religious faith must be committed to the transformation of social structures.

The Network for Spiritual Progressives’ mission statement, for example, affirms its desire

“To build a social change movement – guided by and infused with spiritual and ethical values – to transform our society into one that prioritizes and promotes the well-being of the people and the planet, as well as love, justice, peace, and compassion over money, power, and profit.”

Rev. William Barber. AP Photo/Jonathan Drew

One of the most important voices of the religious left is North Carolina minister William Barber. Barber’s organization, “Repairers of the Breach,” seeks to train clergy and laity from a variety of faith traditions in grassroots activism. Barber’s hope is grassroots activists will be committed to social change by “rebuilding, raising up and repairing our moral infrastructure.”

Other organizations associated with the religious left express similar goals. Often embracing democratic socialism, these groups engage issues of racial justice (including support for the Black Lives Matter movement), LGBT equality and the defense of religious minorities.

An attractive option?

Despite the public visibility of activists like Barber, some question whether the religious left can become a potent political force.

Sociologist James Wellman observes often religious progressives lack the “social infrastructure that creates and sustains a social movement; its leaders are spiritual entrepreneurs rather than institution builders.”

Another challenge is the growing secularization of the political left. Only 30 percent of Americans who identify with the political left view religion as a positive force for social change.

At the same time, the religious left’s progressive agenda – in particular, its focus on serving society’s poor – might be an attractive option for younger Americans who seek alternatives to the perceived dogmatism of the religious right. As an activist connected with Jim Wallis’ “Sojourners”organization noted,

“I think the focus on the person of Jesus is birthing a younger generation…. Their political agenda is shaped by Jesus’ call to feed the hungry, make sure the thirsty have clean water, make sure all have access to healthcare, transform America into a welcoming place for immigrants, fix our inequitable penal system, and end abject poverty abroad and in the forgotten corners of our urban and rural communities.”

This statement not only circles back to Charles Sheldon’s nineteenth century question, “what would Jesus do?” It illustrates, I argue, the continued resiliency of the core social gospel belief in social salvation for a new generation of activists.

Can the religious left achieve the public status of the religious right? The theme of “social salvation” critical to Walter Rauschenbusch, A.J. Muste, and Martin Luther King Jr. might, I believe, very well galvanize the activism of a new generation of religious progressives.

 

5 thoughts on “The Social Gospel

  1. I’ve spent my life on the edge of social gospel Christianity. The Unity Church of my youth wasn’t exactly social gospel, but closely related to it. I do find it greatly appealing. Even in now being non-religious, I have a hard time holding bad feelings toward religion. I have fond childhood memories of faith and the inspiration it can offer. I’d like to believe that a religious left could rise up.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. I think the tradition embodied by Martin Luther King and Cornel West in America certainly interprets the teachings of Jesus in a “socialist” way. This very well may be the “correct” way in which to view Jesus’ teachings.

    However, what’s below is certainly is the “wrong” way to interpret the Sermon on the Mount. That much is clear.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Whether the Son of God, or merely an historical figure, everyone loves Jesus — even unbelievers and/or the unchurched. They know of Him. The Lord’s words, deeds, principles exude a righteous authority, even for many of the “unsaved.”

    Political far-right Christians do not own Jesus. In fact, their ugly, unprincipled, cherry-picked doctrines have caused the greatest surge of atheism in American history. (At least, that’s my guess.)

    Yes, it’s the perfect time for the Left to shine the Lord’s light on the Common Good. Of course, Jesus was an anti-corruption socialist! “The least of these shall be first…” In troubled times, people are very hungry for hope and love. Barber and West rock!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s